If I start with an equilateral triangle 10 miles on each side (area ~43 square miles), then move one of the corners 10 miles in order to maximize the new area, it’s obvious what I should do: move one of the corners 10 miles away from the centre of the original triangle. This would make my new territory an isosceles triangle with angles 75, 75, 30 (area ~93 square miles).
If instead I can move all three of the corners by 10 miles, I would move each of them 10 miles directly away from the triangle centre and get a larger equilateral triangle (area ~323 square miles).
If however, I could only move two corners, each by 10 miles, moving them directly away from the original centre of the circle, (giving an area of ~187 square miles and angles of 45,45,90), would not in fact give the maximum area.
It is possible to achieve a maximum area of over 191 square miles (moving only two corners 10 miles each), but what would the angles of the resulting triangle be in this case?
Quisque iaculis facilisis lacinia. Mauris euismod pellentesque tellus sit amet mollis.